On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 18:11 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > >>> (Maybe views will answer my existential questions...) > >>> > >>> > >>Yes, they will! > >> > >> > >> > > > >Yes, please, Cyriaque, have a look into views. > > > > > Waouh ! It's amazing. > My plug in can be shrinked to two small contracts !
:) I was expecting something like this. ;-) > And I really like the distinction between head and body which > automatically includes scripts in the header ! > I will continue my study tomorrow, but I think it's the solution I was > looking for for ages. > :) nice to hear, welcome to views. ;-) > The only thing is I was used to the pelt skin... > I am going to see what I can do. > Actually we have to provide all contract that we are using right now on forrest.apache.org before we can call our default.fv default. ;-) It would be really nice to see pelt done with views. Maybe we can even fix he floating searchbox css bug. ;-) > Thanks a lot, > > >I reckon what you really want to do is writing your own viewHelper.xhtml > >plugin. This plugin can be compared with the traditional "skin-packages" > >like pelt. It provides contracts, css and a default view implementation > >(html skeleton) like a skin with the advantage that a designer can > >easily change parts or the whole lot of the skin without touching > >contracts (xsl-code). > > > >Please join us on developing views. > > > > > Why not, > :) > >salu2 > > > > > Cyriaque, > salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
