On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 11:10 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > > Cyriaque Dupoirieux a écrit : > > ... > > >> In fact : > >> > >> * the tags <disable-???-link/> can be considered as deprecated with > >> views, > >> * attributes @location or @location-box also... > >> > >> I like it. > >> But then, because nothing is simple, we should not test the > >> motd-page/@location nor the minitoc/@location in the following : > >> > >> * content-minitoc.ft, > >> * content-motd-page.ft > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > > Forget it, the problem is different with toc and motd location... > > It is important to decide where you want to display a toc ... > > No you were right fist time. The location should be set in the Template > (was View),
Please do *not* make more confusion and call views templates. Until we decide officially we will rename them they are *views*. I am preparing a proposal and then we can discuss the renaming. @Cyriaque you are right we need to clean out the contracts from skinconf. skinconf is deprecated in views and hereby should not be used within the contracts. salu2 > not in the contract. COnsider, for example, that the MOTD > normally appears in both the nav menu and the body, for the photogallery > plugin this does not work since the MOTD overlays the photo's displayed. > > Ross > > Ross > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
