On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 09:34 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi a écrit : ... > > > >Again, why cannot we use the second version instead of creating another > >new language? > > > > > > > I agree with Nicola, the notation becomes a little complicated just to > add a div or a span...
Please see my other answer on it. > Furthermore, I had big problem with empty <div/> tags which are not well > interpreted by browsers (Firefox and IE at least) > So why don't we automates the <div> </div> generation if the tag is empty ? > Just call a vote/proposal for this. It will change the default behavior that we had till now so I am more comfortable if we call a vote/proposal. That will give us the attention that this change deserve. I do not have strong feeling to change the default behavior to <div> </div> instead of <div/> or keeping it like it is. The only difference is the use of nbsp="false" instead of "true". It depends which usecase we have more often. ;-) salu2 > Salutations, > Cyriaque, > -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
