On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:06 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: > I think that's because we talked about type="span" and type="div" which > are well known for XHTML writer. > We might have talked about type="inline" and type="block" but it would > have been a little bit <fo> oriented :-) .
Actually I really like type="inline" and type="block" because it saying something about the functionality of the hook even that this name coincident with fo. I reckon we should rename it this way. WDOT? -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
