Thorsten Scherler wrote: > When you mean using "Cocoon Portlets rather then views" and dropping the > whole view implementation, then no. There is more to view then the scope > of portlets. ...
It seems to me that you are a bit on the defensive side, and this mail does not seem to be constructive. My first reaction to the coplet stuff was "Forrest is not a portal!", but then I tried to understand better, and it seems to make more sense. I'm not saying that I want it, but I agree with Ross that there is some interesting stuff there. Maybe reading this could help in understanding why Forrest as a portal could make sense: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=101431895118349 -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------
