Diwaker Gupta wrote:
The naming convention for the plugins is fine, but I think it would be nice if
users are able to declare required plugins using simpler names like "pdf",
"text", "docbook" and so on.
We can figure out what simple names exactly to use later. I just wanted to see
what people feel about this? It should be trivial to implement (though I have
_no_ clue how! :-D), and I think it'll make config much less intimidating
(even I get scared typing org.apache.forrest.input.viewHelper.xhtml.ls)
Diwaker
Look for cocoon roles. BTW, I like the idea. :-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
