Gav.... wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > | We were using that i18n fix as an excercise > | for you to understand the core processing. > | I reckon that we should take the easy route > | with the suggestion to add a special transformer > | at the end to strip out <text> tags. > | > | I can try that if you would rather get on with > | the CSS. > > Thats up to you, if you want to clear the issue out and > get it closed.
Okay, that is done now. > I am understanding more than I did when > I first started investigating i18n, but as you can see I > have not rectified it yet so I still have some way to go. > I would have liked the satisfaction of getting this one > licked, but I seem to be diverting on to easier tasks > and not concentrating on this one. I am sure I will > understand this and other harder stuff in the future. Thanks for your help with this issue though. We are now closer to valid html, down from 4 errors to one. I am glad that you learned something out of the exercise. The sitemap processing will probably be revised and simplified when we implement the XHTML2 as the internal structure. -David
