On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:27 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... > > Doh! You are right, I had already implemented the very solution you > describe in a different use case. >
;-) > > Your point that this seems like a hack because we touching two things is > > valid. You wrote: > > "Of course, a hack is a quick solution, if we find this truly useful > > then we can find a way of getting this into the view-resolver" > > ... > > > I will have no time tonight, so I cannot try. I reckon it is worth a > > shoot. > > > > Anyway, wdyt? > > I think your idea sounds like a sensible one. I'm happy with the hack > for now. But if you want to try this out I'll be even happier. My only > concern is that all *.fv files will be in a single file. No, only the ones with multiple views for a single source. The other can stay like they are. > But I guess > jxtempaltes allow me to import external files. > Actually, yes and it will give you what you always wanted. Remember your forrest:import suggestion? ;-) BTW the suggestion to base views on jx:templates came originally from Nicola. The nice thing on it: we do not have to implement my former logic:bla stuff because that comes for free with jx templates (like lots of other things). [I hear Gregor clapping in his hands ;-)] salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)