Tim Williams wrote:
On 8/31/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
even if I running in the danger to have called this vote (again) too
early but see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112551792600003&r=1&w=2.
Michael Wechner wrote
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lenya-dev&m=112551727916047&w=2:
I think the Lenya community should give commit access to the Forrest
community
if people agree to enhance the default publication of Lenya. If it is going
to be a specific Forrest-Lenya publication, then I think it doesn't
really matter
where it's being housed as long as both communities have commit access ;-)
I think the same and we already discussed it.
My
+1
salu2
[OT] Nicola, that seems to be a case for simple committership. ;-)
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
-0
I know that only for a veto is an explanation necessary but I feel
obligated to provide my rationale.
o) I see no *pragmatic* difference between committership and this svn
access--both have write access, neither have binding votes. The
difference is only the words.
o) Seeing no pragmatic difference, I consider this essentially the
same as a vote for commitership and, there's no merit, so I dont' see
how it can be possible. I think perhaps the bar for commitership might
very well be lower for existing commiters on other projects but not so
low as to having contributed nothing.
o) I see valid alternatives: (e.g. GSOC-type restricted and temporary
access like Cocoon did with their GSOC folks)
In fact, the give the access in this sense. Note, that we are not voting
new forrest committers. Remember that at any time, the Forrest PMC can
call again a VOTE to close the access.
The two reasons I'm not vetoing this:
o) I have faith in those who are more experienced than I with the
Apache Way to do the right thing.
Thank you very much! I really apreciate your vote of confidence!
o) I recognize that my dissent is more principle-based than pragmatic
(i.e. the Lenya folks are really good and really smart so there will
likely not be any harm in this -- and the intent is to try and get
stuff done.) I do find it somewhat ironic that the principles that I
think are being compromised are ones that are very dear to every here
but very new to me.
Don't feel that. I fully understand you, believe me. ;-)
Regardless, I look forward to seeing progress with doco...
+1
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
