On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 08:56 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > On 9/8/05, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Hi all, > >>why are we using views in the xhtml2 plugin? > > > > > > This seems like an odd question. > > Hmmm... yes, it is.. > > > Because views are an integral part > > of the TR? The plugin has turned into a next-gen forrest complete w/ > > new internal structure, refined views, integral locationmap usage, and > > streamlined sitemap. > > My take is similar. > > Views are to go into core as soon as they are mature enough. >
If they are not mature enough, why are they going then into this plugin? What are missing to make them mature enough? > XHTML2 work requires a rewrite of a large proposrtion of core. > agree, but should we not just focus on the document part first? > Skins are to be deprecated when views go into core. > Should we not state this officially first? > Doing the XHTML2 work in skins would be wasted effort. > Agree partly, you and me having the same thought of getting away from tab, menu, doc and site processing, but are we *all* agree on that? > Therefore we use views. > Actually I have problems to follow this logic, see the question above. > > Why do you ask? > > Yes, please Thorsten, why do you ask, have you spotted something wrong > with the approach? see above -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
