Gav.... wrote: > From: "David Crossley" wrote: > | > | Well, both Jing and Xerces insist on using xml:id > | when used with the WD-xhtml2-20050527 RNG grammars. > > Ok, no problem.
Mmmm, i hope not anyway. The issue you pointed to might not get resolved. > | > | There are a couple of validation "errors" remaining. It seems that the > | > RELAX NG grammars are missing some things, so i sent mail to the WD > editor. > | > Missing the "layout" atribute and missing the "full" attribute for abbr. > | > > | > Well yes there seems to be a few things missing . > | > | Please send feedback to them, if you spot errors. > > Will do. > > | > So I can check the same as you, what technique are you using to validate > ? > | > | Yes, i said earlier this week. Easy to miss in the flurry. > | > | In the new plugin, uncomment the validation transformer (2 occurrences). > | > whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/structurer.xmap > | around line 240 etc. > | > | However, this is a preview of a facility that Pier is currently > | adding to Cocoon-2.1 and when he finishes it we can add it to > | Cocoon trunk and update our version in Forrest. > | > | So you need to look at build/webapp/WEB-INF/logs/error.log > | to see the relevant line number for the error in the source file. > | > | I am actually using a version of Cocoon-2.1 rather than Forrest > | and added a little pipeline to the Validation block sample. > > Taking a look, thanks. > I have downloaded Cocoon Trunk, If I decide to go this way > are there instructions anywhere on doing this? No, not trunk, rather the 2.1 branch. Please search our dev archives for last week, Google: site:marc.theaimsgroup.com forrest validation > | If you have another RELAX NG validator handy, then see > | forrest/main/webapp/resources/schema/relaxng/WD-xhtml2-20050527 > > I have had a look, looks great, I can not see however a reference to the > Role Access Module or > its sub - 25.2 Role Collection. This was last of NKB's list and I was going > to implement it in > the test xml file. (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-role.html) . Are we > giving this a miss for > now or did I miss where it was referenced? No, it was just that there is no RELAX NG defined for that module. That is another question to the WD editor i suppose. -David
