Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > the update try experience made me think why are we not splitting cocoon > apart from forrest. > > I mean you would need them both to make forrest running. That would > overcome the whole procedure. We can set certain revision numbers of > cocoon-2.2 till it is not released. Kind of we having in lenya. > > Any thoughts?
I don't like it. I can visualise us having to support a stack of Cocoon user questions and we don't have enough people here to help. Also we use cocoon trunk so that makes it even harder for our users. I would rather than we Forrest committers did a little bit of extra work, to make it easier for our developers/users. -David
