David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
What we lose by using this naming convention is the ability to look at the sitemap and then go straight to the file on disk, we would have to then open the locationmap to see what the actual filename was.What do others think?Could we generate a page from the locationmap, similar to the generated linkmap.html page, and show the list in various different index order. That may be sufficient to make up for the loss of readability.
+1 Ross
