El vie, 14-10-2005 a las 11:53 +1000, David Crossley escribió: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley escribi??: > > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > > Log: > > > > > Views v2 codename: (views-) structurer > > > > > > You said in a recent email that "views" were > > > more than "structurer". Have we still not got' > > > our names right? > > > > IMO the best name would be "dispatcher view". That is exactly what views > > (v1 and v2) is. ;-) > > > > ...but we wanted to rename them because the term view was causing > > confusions (cocoon-views, eclipse-view, ...). > > > > That is the reason I have chosen the name even if that is not perfect > > either. > > Then "dispatcher" is the name for the whole thing. > I have started using that term in the documentation.
+1 that is good stuff. The forrest dispatcher is based on a structurer and a themer. Views (codename) = dispatcher (release name) Views v1 (stable) codename: v1 Views v2 (testing) codename: v2 salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
