Erik Brakkee wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > >It seems to me that this proposal is missing the > >abilities of the Cocoon sitemap and is just treating > >Cocoon as an xml processor. > > The include mechanism is using the features of the sitemap. It is > nothing more than a layer to make xincludes in Forrest more usable. > > Right now, since the mechanism is implemented on top of forrest and not > inside of forrest, there is some duplication of work so that > new schemes added to the site map would also have to be added to the > include mechanism. Nevertheless, that would not be necessary if it is > implemented inside Forrest.
I meant that it is often better to use map:aggregate and get the parts from cocoon: pipelines that trim them down to exactly the required information, rather than using xinclude. -David
