Thorsten Scherler wrote: > David Crossley escribi??: > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribi??: > > > ... > > > > Throsten - or anyone using structurer, - can you try forrest site > > > > and > > > > tell me (if you have time.) > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-675 > > > > > > Please see this issue and *a lots* of FIXME notes in the structurer. > > > > > > "forrest site" is *not* expected to work!!! We need to resolve this > > > issue that v2 supports static forrest again. > > > > Hmmm, that is not correct. That FOR-675 affects both > > 'forrest run' and 'forrest site' with the same effects: > > ... the broken "site:" and "ext:" links. > > Yes and no. The linkmap.html is used to crawl. Now if you have a site > that is using heavily site:bla then the links on the linkmap are all > NULL. That let forrest site directly fail. forrest run instead do not > need the linkmap.xml.
Okay, sorry, i see what you are saying now. Hmmm, i don't remember that happening in the earlier discovery of this FOR-675 issue. Maybe i am delirious. > > As far as i know it does not affect anything else. > > > > So i don't know why you needed to comment-out all the > > linkrewriter stuff. That just makes it hard to test > > to see if the bug is still present. > > ??? What do you mean? I thought that i had fixed the bug and started testing in the various scenarios. Testing it in the new structurer plugin is hard because the use of linkrewriter transformer is commented-out. Never mind the bug is not yet fixed. > > > We need to add a strip_namespaces.xsl before returning site.xml to have > > > a workaround for this issue. > > > > Yes. > > > > -David
