David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I wonder if it is because there in no "unversioned"
plugin in the 0.7 directory. At 0.7 release time
perhaps we needed to copy the unversioned ones there too.
Yes, that will be it, I'll look into this ASAP. Thanks.
I tried this by:
cd forrest-site/plugins/0.7/
svn cp org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.projectInfo-0.1.zip
org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.projectInfo.zip
svn commit
... then waited for the hourly cronjob to 'svn update' our site.
Then tried again with forrest_07 and same problem that was
reported above.
I noticed that it is trying to retrieve:
http://forrest.apache.org/plugins//org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.projectInfo.zip
... perhaps needs /0.7/ in that empty space.
Thanks David. I'll have to dig into the build files to see what is
happening. Probaboly won't have the time until the end of the week at
the earliest.
I did this today and it now works for me with forrest_07_branch.
---------------
[main]$ svn diff var/pluginlist2fetch.xsl
Index: var/pluginlist2fetch.xsl
===================================================================
--- var/pluginlist2fetch.xsl (revision 329512)
+++ var/pluginlist2fetch.xsl (working copy)
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
<target name="fetch-unversioned-plugin"
unless="versioned-plugin.present">
<echo>Versioned plugin unavailable, trying to get versionless
plugin...</echo>
<get verbose="true" usetimestamp="true" ignoreerrors="true">
- <xsl:attribute name="src"><xsl:value-of select="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/@url"
/>/<xsl:value-of select="$plugin-name" />.zip</xsl:attribute>
+ <xsl:attribute name="src"><xsl:value-of select="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/@url" />/<xsl:value-of
select="$forrest-version" />/<xsl:value-of select="$plugin-name" />.zip</xsl:attribute>
---------------
So our plugin deployment process needs to put a copy
of the plugin into the specific version directory, e.g.
in plugins/0.8-dev/ and we need to manually add them to
the plugins/0.7/ directory.
Thanks for looking at this David, as you guessed I have not had the time
yet. Something does not ring true for me with this patch. I don't have
the time to check the main plugin build.xml right now, but from memory:
What happens when a plugin is deployed is that a versioned copy is put
into the a specific Forrest directory (i.e. 0.8) and an unversioned copy
is put into the root distirbution directory (I *think* that I prevented
a versioned copy with a "-dev" version number going into the versioned
Forrest directory).
This means that a versioned copy is in the correct versioned forrest
directory (identified in the plugins own build.xml). Remember that a
plugin is intended to work with a minimum version of Forrest. The
unversioned copy of the plugin was plaved in the root unversioned
directory in order to minimise the number of copies that we need on the
server. The assumption was that people using development versions of
plugins will be using development versions of Forrest.
This is not a good assumption.
Perhaps we then don't need the unversioned plugins at
the plugins/ directory, rather only have them in the
specific sub-directory.
Yes, and I think the version resolving gode needs to be refined as well.
Currently, if a plugin works in 0.7 and 0.8-dev I think we need a copy
of the plugin in both subdirectories as the plugin resolving code does
not check other directories. What we need is for the loading code to
look first in the correct Forrest version directory, then in the
previous version and so on until it finds the right version of the plugin.
We can hack this solutoin together in the ANT scripts fairly easily
(time allowing ;-)
For the future I want to create a new plugin resolving mechanism that
loads plugins at runtime rather than at startup. We need to modify the
Locationmap somthing like this:
<match pattern="plugin.xmap.*">
<location src="{project:tmp}/{1}/>
<install src="http://f.a.o/plugins/0.8/{1}/>
<install src="http://f.a.o/plugins/0.7/{1}/>
<location src="{forrest:plugin.fallback}/error.pluginNotFound.xmap"/>
</match>
The we can dynamically install features at run time rather than at
startup. We would even be able to add plugins at runtime.
Still, I digress. I've added these comments to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-741 (good to see JIRA forcing
me to add a component)
In the meantime we need to advise users to add a version number as you
discovered.
I am surprised that we are not getting more pleas for
help from users of the 0.7 projectInfo plugin.
It will only affect new users. Those who have the plugin installed
already will not be trying to retrieve it, therefore no problem emerges..
