Hi All,

A couple of observations, these may be bugs or may be me so I'll check here 
first.

1. When I did a seed-v2 and then forrest run , creating an index.fv and then 
altering it made
no difference after refreshing the browser. When creating a forrrest site, 
this did make
a difference.

2. After removing index.fv from xdocs directory, rebuilding and reuploading, 
index.html
still shows as though index.fv were still there ( 
http://apache.minitutorials.com/ ) , no menus
etc...

3. index.fv provided with /samples/ has this for the footer feedback 
contract :-

<forrest:contract name="siteinfo-feedback">
          <forrest:properties contract="siteinfo-feedback">
            <forrest:property name="siteinfo-feedback">
              <feedback to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
                href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&#160;" >
                Send feedback about the website to:
              </feedback>
            </forrest:property>
          </forrest:properties>
        </forrest:contract>

The code this produces is :-

<div id="siteinfo-feedback">
                Send feedback about the website to:
              <a id="feedbackto" 
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] samples/index.html"><a 
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">webmaster at
   foo.com</a></a></div>

which is incorrect nesting of the <a> element and also multiple declarations 
of the href and mailto when there is no need. Should this not read

<div id="siteinfo-feedback">
                Send feedback about the website to:
              <a id="feedbackto" 
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
samples/index.html"></a></div>

Where is the extra.. <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">webmaster at 
foo.com</a> ..coming from ??

4. Default sizing seems to be 10px which looks rather small , menu items and 
'search the site with google' etc are at either 80, 85, or 90 percent of 
that and so are unreadable. This is of course a minor issue in the grand 
scheme of getting v2 working but one would of thought the site produced 
should look similar to the forrest.apache.org live site.

5. In the inline CSS of the /samples/index.html page there is produced a 
wierd and non-compliant use of code when ever the  background-image url is 
used.
For instance multiple times there are instances of :-

#header .round-top-left-small {
    background-image: 
url(../themes/images/roundcorner-t-l-5-bgFFFFFF-stroke000000-fg000000.png);<a 
href="../themes/images/roundcorner-t-l-5-bgFFFFFF-stroke000000-fg000000.png"> 
</a>;
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
    background-position: top left;
}

This occurs on every instance of when an image is referenced using the 
background-image: url .
The extra :-

<a 
href="../themes/images/roundcorner-t-l-5-bgFFFFFF-stroke000000-fg000000.png"> 
</a>;

is neither required nor compliant.

Thats about it for now.

Gav...





-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.8/183 - Release Date: 25/11/2005



-- 
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/