David Crossley wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley escribi??: > > > Ross Gardler wrote: > > > > However, there are more general community issues here as well, and I > > > > would like to look at them. Here are three community observations (and > > > > as far as I am concerned the really important part of this): > > > > > > > > 1) Some people seem to feel that the normal ASF meritocracy is not > > > > sufficient credit within Forrest. Why should Forrest be different from > > > > other ASF projects? Do we need to do something different? > > > > Hmm, what is your definition of normal? > > See the end of my previous email in this thread. > In my copius spare time i plan to add a section > to our project guidelines to define exactly > how we currently acknowledge contributions. > > Then we can discuss in a calm manner whether > any of that needs changing. Or hopefully each > one of us can fine-tune and edit that in > the normal opensource fashion.
Okay i have made an attempt to capture how we currently do this. Not yet published to the site, so look at your local copy. cd site-author svn up forrest run http://localhost:8888/guidelines.html#way http://localhost:8888/guidelines.html#contribution "Lazy approval" applies. -David
