Gav.... wrote: > From: Ross Gardler > > David Crossley (JIRA) wrote: > > > > > > Thanks. I am on UNIX and can see the problem line-endings in your > > > Windows-generated attachment, e.g. at lines 38 and 39 ... > > > > > > 35 </head>^M$ > > > 36 <body>^M$ > > > 37 <div id="container">^M$ > > > 38 <!--+$ > > > 39 | start breadtrail$ > > > 40 +-->^M$ > > > 41 <div class="breadtrail">^M$ > > > > I already did a thorought analysis oif this problem - see the linked > > messages. The above highlights the problem - it is *only* in the > > comments that are the problem. This is confirmed in the Xalan issue this > > one depends on. > > Yes, I guess David wanted another confirmation from another Windows user.
Ross' Description of FOR-492 is back-to-front in its explanation of line-endings. Hence my request on 04/Mar for an explicit example. We need to change that Description. > Anyway, seeing as the XALANJ-656 issue has not been updated since January, > has Anyone tried your suggestion of using FixCRLF in Ant ? > > Do you want me to try it on my system? I don't see how that will work, as it would just mangle the rest of the line-endings for Windows users. It would be better to follow up on the XALAN issue. I have wanted to for a long time but i couldn't get anyone to comment on my FOR-492 query. Now we can point them to further information. By the way, this issue came up again at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list yesterday: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114518424300001 -David
