Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El jue, 20-04-2006 a las 10:40 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe escribió:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Am I helping or confusing?
Helping (me), thanks.
Still, I'm looking at this and wonder.
It seems to me like these cascades create a behavior that is very hard to
predict by the user. And probably - unless you really study that
sitemap - for many developers as well.
Yes, you are right the resource.xmap is *very* complex and *very* hard
to understand.
Should we really have all this legacy support and usage pattern choices
implemented in this way?
IMO no, that should go through the locationmap, however this is not that
simple since we have a wide range of different matches that cannot
directly be taken from the lm.
I already refactored the resource.xmap to use the locationmap [1]. It
has been massively simplified. From what I can see everything now goes
through the the locationamp. What are the specific problems you still see?
NB - as mentioned elsewhere, the legacy support is still in the
locationmap, we stil need to address this
Ross
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/forrest/trunk/main/webapp/resources.xmap?rev=359672&r1=294916&r2=359672&diff_format=h
