El vie, 21-04-2006 a las 17:51 +1000, David Crossley escribió: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > Ross Gardler escribi??: > > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > Clay Leeds escribi??: > > > >>Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >>>Web Maestro Clay wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>>I'm not sure whether or not to suppress <style/>, but it would be > > > >>>>nice to have the ability to have 'on-the-fly' ODT styles. > > > >>> > > > >>>I'm -1 on allowing abitrary styles though. The problem is that > > > >>>Forrest attempts to provide a unified output formats regardless of > > > >>>the input format. If we allow arbitrary styles through then we > > > >>>loose the ability to do this because uses will create "headings" by > > > >>>making text larger and bold, for example. Forrest has no way of > > > >>>knowing this is supposed to be a heading and therefore cannot > > > >>>render it as such. > > > >> > > > >>I can understand that. I'll file the desire for on-the-fly styles > > > >>under the 'it would be nice...' flag. :-) > > > > > > > > I added such a contract. I have not tested it (will do later) since I am > > > > on my way out, but _should_ work. ;) > > > > > > Last time I looked -1 from a committer was a blocker on code. I > > > appreciate that this optional, but I'm still not sure it is a good idea. > > > It will cause maintenance problems. > > > > I did not see a vote on it and interpreted your -1 as stating your > > personal opinion. > > We don't need to vote on everything. We gauge > consensus in preference to explicit voting.
agree > > IMO people should not use voting symbols in discussion > unless they mean it. Then we all know where we stand. I do not know. I do not see a big problem to use it in any thread (knowing that only voting threads have binding character). salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
