Thorsten Scherler wrote: > David Crossley escribi??: > > Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > ... > > > > The term "Active PMC members" seems to cause > > > > confusion about who has a binding vote. It was > > > > intended to just clarify the Unanimous and > > > > 2/3 Majority situations, so that we didn't need > > > > to chase people and force them to vote. The word > > > > "Active" would now be removed. > > > > > > > So for the 2/3 Majority situation, the chair can > > > > decide on a case-by-case basis if a quorum has > > > > been reached. > > > > > > Why not simply talk about 2/3 of the votes (those who choose to vote) > > > within a reasonable time frame? > > > > Hey, good idea. I reckon that would remove the > > ambiguity about who has binding votes. > > Does that mean all votes are binding (committer as well)?
Only PMC member votes are binding. See our Guidelines. -David
