Thorsten Scherler wrote: > Web Maestro Clay escribi??: > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > and then we should create a forrest specific xsl and import the common > > > one. IMO we should leave the common *as it* since one can import/ > > > include > > > xsl and override only specific matches (less code to maintain). > > > > Although you say we should leave the COMMON as is, but there are > > holes in the current ODT implementation: > > - no graphics support > > - no support for numbered lists > > - Forrest fixme, warning, note (Forrest-specific, but doesn't Lenya > > want Fixme, Warning & Note too?) > > - <sub> & <sup> > > - <strong>, <em> > > > > Shouldn't those be added to the COMMON, so Lenya can benefit as well? > > The problem is that the common odt is actually coming from David > Eisenberg and in no way lenya specific (IMO best for us to use an > svn:external reference to his svn server instead of providing a copy).
I don't like the idea of relying on some other organisation's SVN server. -David > I > think we should only enhance it (as we finding bugs) but normally use it > as it like I tried to explain in FOR-872 and demonstrated in > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397657&view=rev. > > Regarding the above downsides I agree we should implement *another* > common xsl (for forrest and lenya - common-apache-odt.xsl) and import it > in e.g. odt-to-forrest-xhtml.xsl. If we (lenya and forrest as first > tester) are happy with the results *then* we should patch the common > (from D. Eisenberg) and send the patch to him that he can incorporate > them in his next version. > > salu2 > -- > thorsten > > "Together we stand, divided we fall!" > Hey you (Pink Floyd) >
