I'm back--late? I'm +0 on both.
I don't dare a +1 since I once removed myself from the active list and David put me back there: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=112372739418058&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=112369220218443&w=2 I'm glad and proud to be part of Forrest! Johannes David Crossley wrote: > David Crossley wrote: >> The proposal addresses two separate issues: >> >> ------------------------ >> A) Remove each mention of "Active" from guidelines.html +0 >> So this will mean that the people who have binding votes >> are "PMC Members". >> >> Also change the definitions of "Unanimous consensus" and >> "2/3 majority" to stop saying "All voters with binding >> votes must vote" and instead refer to number of "votes cast". >> >> Add a note about the chair deciding whether a quorum >> has been reached. >> >> Add a note to reinforce that PMC members can be as active >> as they choose, with no pressure from the project. >> People can be quiet and speak up occasionally when they >> see a topic that motivates them enough to contribute >> to the discussion or to cast a vote. >> >> PMC members can still declare themselves "emeritus" >> if they so choose. Nicola Ken was an example. In such >> a case we notify the board and remove them from the >> list of PMC members. >> >> ------------------------ >> B) Remove the separation of "active" committers from who.html +0 >> >> There will be one list. The PMC members will be marked. >> Emeritus PMC members will be marked in a different way. >> >> There will be explanations of how to see who is "active" >> for those who care, e.g. search the mail archives; look >> at changes.html; etc. >> >> Add a note to explain the evolution of Forrest to >> a top-level project and hence the introduction of >> a PMC which did not include the old absent committers. >> >> ------------------------ > > Anyone can vote. It is good to hear the opinions of developers. > As usual the binding votes are those of PMC members. > Using "Consensus approval": > http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#approvals > The vote will run for the normal one week and so finish at > midnight UTC on 2005-05-10 > http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?year=2006&month=05&day=11 > > Please vote on these two proposals: > > A) Remove each mention of "Active" from guidelines.html > > B) Remove the separation of "active" committers from who.html > > -David > -- User Interface Design GmbH Teinacher Str. 38, 71634 Ludwigsburg Fon: +49-7141-37700-0 Fax: +49-7141-37700-99 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: www.uidesign.de Geschäftsstellen: Teinacher Str. 38, 71634 Ludwigsburg Lehrer-Götz-Weg 11, 81825 München Friedrichsring 46, 68161 Mannheim Buch "User Interface Tuning" von Joachim Machate & Michael Burmester www.user-interface-tuning.de Attraktivität von interaktiven Produkten messen mit www.attrakdiff.de
