Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
I really like the idea of shorter session on specific points (some FOR to be resolved for instance).
It is worth noting that my suggestion was based on a discussion I had with Paul (at least I think it was Paul) in the second or third Forrest Friday. He works with IRC as a regular part of his paid Job and encouraged us to have a tighter focus.
(Maybe we will have time problems - I mean between Europe and Australia :-P ?)
Yes, that is my biggest concern. We also need to remember that we have people in the US time zones as well.
At present we have a free-for-all with respect to time. So in order to ensure one is online when something important is being discussed one has to be present for 24 hours - not good. At least with the shorter sessions one can be present or can veto the discussion. This should limit exclusions from the sessions due to time differences to external commitments.
Maybe we may have 2 sessions per month because with this approach, we certainly are not going to participate to each.
Yes, that is a possibility, should this prove popular/successful. Ross
