> -----Original Message----- > From: Thorsten Scherler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 8:54 PM > To: dev@forrest.apache.org > Subject: Re: PoC StAX implementation of dispatcher > > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 13:41 +1100, David Crossley wrote: > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > > > To make the version compile you need to download > > > the JSR 173 API from > > > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0/stax-api-1.0.jar > > > and copy it to lib/api/. We cannot redistribute the API (it was once a > > > discussion on cocoon-dev when the jcr got introduced). > > > > Would you please explain that further. > > I cannot post any citation from the mail I referred since I just saw > that it was a private list where I read it. > > Bottom line of the mail was that the JSR-170 terms of license allowed by > Sun's lawyers for the JCR specification (which includes the JCR > interface jar) are not compatible with ASF.
You sure about that ? I have not looked deeply into it so I apologise, but With me being on a number of Apache Mailing Lists, JSR-170 rang a bell When I saw it in your mail. Please take a look at :- http://jackrabbit.apache.org/ (Jackrabbit) http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 (ASF is member of expert group) http://www.openwfe.org/openwfe-jcr-beancoder.html (Used with Maven) > > Futher it was pointed out that the JCR API (as interface), will either > already be present in the J2SE engine (with or without an implementation > from java 6 up) or must be downloaded and installed by the user (either > directly in $JAVA_HOME/lib or into the location I pointed out before > (whiteboard/dispatcher/lib/api)). > > The following has to be done once: > cd whiteboard/dispatcher/lib > mkdir api > cd api > wget http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/stax/stax-api/1.0/stax-api-1.0.jar . I think I would prefer %FORREST_HOME%/lib/optional , keeps all these Required but not endorsed jars in the same place, and no need to Re-write anything when things move from one place to another, i.e. >From whiteboard to plugin. > > After this you can > ./build.sh > ./dispatch. I could probably do a build.bat version for us windoze users, will dispatch Require the same treatment ? Gav... > > salu2 > > P.S.: Does this answer your question? > > > > -David
