David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Sun Mar 4 23:09:18 2007
New Revision: 514581
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514581
Log:
Already 2007 already.
Modified:
forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
Modified: forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml?view=diff&rev=514581&r1=514580&r2=514581
==============================================================================
--- forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml (original)
+++ forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml Sun Mar 4 23:09:18 2007
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
<favicon-url>favicon.ico</favicon-url>
<!-- The following are used to construct a copyright statement -->
- <year>2002-2006</year>
+ <year>2002-2007</year>
<vendor>The Apache Software Foundation.</vendor>
<copyright-link>http://www.apache.org/licenses/</copyright-link>
There was loads of discussion about this on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists
in 2005 to 2006 changeover. My recollection of the conclusion was that
we only change the the copyright year if there is a significant change
in the file, not just because the date has rolled over.
In general i agree. That is also one big benefit from the new
source headers.
However this change was for the generated pages of our website.
Others projects (e.g. jackrabbit.apache.org) do it that way too.
Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
Ross
