On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:39 +0900, Gav.... wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gav.... [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, 9 March 2007 10:36 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Ignore Thumbs.db > > > > I just did a propset svn:ignore on Thumbs.db for the target of '.' > > recursive > > > > In other words, to ignore thumbs.db wherever it is in forrest SVN. > > > > This has resulted in every file it seems being modified. > > Sorry, every directory is modified, I should have looked closer, > Maybe it's not too bad a commit as I first feared.
Hmm, IMO it would be save to use a pattern for the svn:ignore of our root directory. Using it recursive would effect all directories but not files (as I understand svn). having said this. Which tool do you use? Which is the command you use? I agree that thumb.db would likely never be stored in the svn. salu2 > > Bur still ... > > > > Therefore I want to confirm if this action is ok to commit. > > > > Thumbs.db are windows generated files that get created whenever a > > directory > > is viewed and that directory has images inside. It's an automatic thing > > that > > I will try and turn off somehow, but it has the effect at the moment of > > sticking thumb.db wherever I go. > > > > The bit I don't understand is why they get committed when I don't > > explicitly > > Add them with svn add. (Unless someone else put them there or when a > > directory is added in its entirety.(?) > > > > Maybe there are too few to worry about just now. > > > > Thoughts > > > > Gav... > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
