> David Crossley wrote: > >> Ross Gardler wrote: >> > Gav.... wrote: >> > >Ok, so we have given plenty more time. >> > > >> > >Looking again at the link Vincent gave , >> > > >> > >http://www.nabble.com/Forrestdoc-and-Maven-JXR-tf3864888s177.html >> > > >> > >shows that Maven are in agreement and happy to take the code. >> > > >> > >What happens now ? >> > >> > Thanks for waking this up. >> > >> > I guess we officially invite Maven to take the code into their SVN, >> > thank them for taking care of it and remove it from our SVN. >> > >> > David, is there anything special we need to do? >> >> Sorry, i have been busy, and still. >> >> I suggest that one of us composes a list of steps, >> then contacts Maven. >> >> Here are some items that i can quickly think of: >> >> * A Maven committer does a complete 'svn copy' of >> everything in forrestdoc. This retains history (and >> can do subsequent moves/deletes from there). > > Absolutely agree: it is a benefit to be part of ASF community ;) > >> * Then a Forrest committer does an 'svn delete' from >> our SVN forrest/whiteboard/forrestdoc >> >> * Maven might need to explore what happened with the >> import of the Vizant code. We haven't really investigated >> the provenance of any of forrestdoc. There are some recent >> notes in >> forrest/whiteboard/forrestdoc/src/java/org/apache/forrest/forrestdoc/ant/doc/package.htm > > I am aware :) > For others, see FOR-1029 > >> * Need to add comments to the various recent email >> threads to provide cross-references for the archives >> and mention the issue number. > > I will also add that Forrest Team needs to remove "Tool: Forrestdoc" > component in jira. > > So, waiting for the green light to go ahead. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > >> -David >> >>
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Proposal--decide-the-future-of-forrestdoc-tf4060050.html#a12190559 Sent from the Apache Forrest - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
