Brian M Dube wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >Brian M Dube wrote: > >>David Crossley wrote: > >> > >>>The legal-discuss@ list wants to approach each use-case > >>>as it comes up. Perhaps we have a unique situation. > >>> > >>I haven't checked each license yet. I wanted to make sure the plugin > >>worked the way I expected before worrying about that too much. It could > >>use a few more eyes, but it does work. > > > >We need to consider not only the supporting libraries, > >but also any additional Forrest java source code, e.g. > >a new Cocoon generator/transformer. > > How do you mean? Assuming the supporting libraries are allowed, what > would be the concern with the generators given that they are original > works of Apache Forrest?
As long as they are original works, then okay. e.g. They might have had snippets of code from other GPL-licensed projects. Also there was some talk on legal-discuss@ that we could not even interface with some libraries. Not sure of the situation now, so i don't want to say too much about that. -David
