David Crossley wrote: > > This proposal is to go with Option 2, i.e. use Cocoon-2.1 branch. [snip] > > This will not preclude doing either Option 1 or > Option 3 (or some other) at a later stage. [snip] > > Please do more testing and also on your own projects.
That would be good, but not really the objective of this discussion. It may uncover a huge impediment, but is looking fine so far. > Please raise any concerns that you might have about > going down this route. This is the main thing. > After discussion settles and it seems that we have > reached consensus, then we will probably hold a vote > to confirm it. It would be good to get the branch merged back ASAP. That would also enable others to create branches more easily. I feel that we have reached consensus already and done so very efficiently. Going to start the vote now. It still gives us one week to reveal any concerns. -David
