Tim Williams wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > We intend to "update" the version of Cocoon used by Forrest > > to be Cocoon-2.1 branch. > > > > Please vote. > > I reckon I've missed discussion on why 2.1.x vs the released 2.2? > It's not intuitive why we would "upgrade" to an outdated version. I > saw FOR-1016 but I didn't see what the show-stopper was. A search > turned up this[1] thread with Thorsten concerned about "pass-through" > - but I'm not sure what that means.
That is the ability that lets our sitemaps work. If a match is not found then it passes through to the next sitemap. That ability was in our old Cocoon-2.2 trunk, and we were not sure it was backported to Cocoon-2.1 branch. It was and it works for us. As for the background, please see the recent "Proposal" thread. It directs you to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1017 and to the old discussion: http://marc.info/?t=116969435600001 -David > I reckon I'm +0 on doing this simple to be out of our current > predicament but think because of how non-intuitive it is, it'd be > worth clearly stating why we are not going with the more obvious > upgrade path. > > --tim > > [1] - http://www.nabble.com/memory-leaks-in-forrest-td18743789.html
