On 20/09/2008, at 0:34:26, Thorsten Scherler wrote:

On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:58 +0100, Pablo Barrera wrote:
On 17/09/2008, at 15:11:56, Pablo Barrera wrote:

Hello

I have developed an small contract to collect and show all links of
a document.

the input is our internal xml format?


Yes, it is. But I was only able to use for the HTML output. Right now I have another version that uses the tei output plugin to create the same effect with the tei output.

My idea is to create a new section on my documents
called "References", so all links could be found in the same place.
After some problems (thanks for the help) I have the system working
smoothly for HTML output using the pelt-html.content.panel.xml
structurer.

Good to hear. :)

However, I would like to obtain a TEI document with the same
section. How could I use my contract with the tei output?

You want the link contract that you described above to be included in a
tei document? Is the above link html specific, or could you directly
reuse it?


I want to have the option to create this "references" section in any kind of output document, mainly html, pdf and tei.

I think I'm a little confuse with TEI being an output plugging and
the way structurers for non-html output work.

Each format that supports the dispatcher needs to declare it. As I see
org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.dispatcher/internal.xmap
there is *.html and *.fo but no *.tei.

In org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.tei/output.xmap it is not declared
either. So you need to declare the dispatcher there as well.

As I am having problems with this particular use of dispatcher

See above the dispatcher is not enabled there, but it is easy to do so.

I am
going to try to modify document-2-tei xsl to add the links at the end
of the document when using a tei output instead of a html output.

Please (if possible) implement the functionality in a seperate xsl that you then include in the doc-2-tei. This way it will be easy to use it as
well in a tei contract if you decide to enable the dispatcher in tei.



So, if I have understand it correctly, we'll have the functionality in two different places, won't we? I will try to get the dispatcher working looking to the files you suggested.

Regards,

Pablo

--
Pablo Barrera
http://gsyc.es/~barrera/