Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Tim Williams wrote: > >> > > >> > FOR-855 verify the license situation prior to each release > >> > - housekeeping > >> > >> I believe Davids work with RAT fixes this issue. > > > > No it does not. There is much more to the job that that. > > I meant that running RAT shows all licence headers are in place. we > still need to do the housekeeping work that is normal due diligence on > a release, of course.
I meant that FOR-855 has much more than just the license header situation. I have been working on it steadily for a long time now, and there is more to do. > >> > FOR-1177 where does forrest use Rhino > >> > >> Not a blocker > > > > Yes it is. At the moment i think that it might be using an > > unsuitable license. > > Why? Rhino is dual licensed under GPL and MPL. MPL is compatible, as > long as we have the relevant NOTICE file. What am I missing that you > are seeing? I will try to clarify it at FOR-1177. When our packaged version of Rhino was prepared, it was probably the old NPL-licensed one. -David
