Gav and David, Forgive me. I don't know either why so many people assume that there's nobody home at Forrest, and so just advertise the 1.5/1.6 problem, but after the third or fourth I just assumed that the project was mighty sleepy. Thus 'residual'. Obviously, I can't be an RM, I'm not a committer. I'll follow David's breadcrumbs soon.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:16 PM, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: >> OK, I now understand about jing. >> >> My motivations here are these: a bunch of foundation project use >> forrest; everyone has to update their branding; the Java 1.6 issue >> gums people up. Given the workaround, a release is not so urgent as I >> expected it to be. > > Yesterday's addition of an FAQ, beyond what was already > in the mail archives and tracker, will let people know > that they can get on with their existing versions. > I am surpised that we do not see people coming > here to ask about that issue. > > We still do need to release ASAP. We know that. > >> Still, I'm willing to poke at some of the issues below, but it would >> be nice to know that there are a few residual PMC members here who >> could actually RM the release (and vote for it). > > The dev archives show that there are a number of > people here. We won't know the answer to your question > until it happens. As usual the catalyst is for someone > to muster the energy to be RM. The most recent VOTE on > our dev list showed that people are still aware. > > -David >
