David Crossley wrote: > > Reminder to Forrest: > Our Gump stuff is described here: > http://forrest.apache.org/gump.html
I do reckon that Gump is useful. If i do not hear otherwise soon from Forrest devs then i will ask Gump to continue. -David > Many thanks to Stefan and others for their efforts with Gump. > > -David > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Dear Community > > > > Apache Gump builds some of your projects and it is quite possible you > > don't know or have by now forgotten about it. > > > > More than half a year ago a technical problem has forced us to turn off > > emails on build failures as we would have been sending out lots of false > > alarms. > > > > Before we re-enable emails we'd like to know whether you are still > > interested in the service Gump provides, so please tell us. :-) > > > > Metadata for many projects have been neglected for a long time and it is > > quite possible they'd need some love for results to be meaningful. All > > Apache committers have write access to Gump's metadata. > > > > In case you don't know what this Gump stuff is about: > > > > Apache Gump builds the full stack of the latest commits of software in > > order to ensure integrity over releases. Build failures surface API > > discontinuities between projects before they impact releases, and Gump's > > e-mail notifications hope to promote the conversations between teams to > > resolve those discontinuities. > > > > When responding to this mail please shorten the CC list as appropriate. > > > > Cheers > > > > Stefan > > > > on behalf of the Gump PMC > >