David Crossley wrote:
>
> Reminder to Forrest:
> Our Gump stuff is described here:
> http://forrest.apache.org/gump.html

I do reckon that Gump is useful.
If i do not hear otherwise soon from Forrest devs
then i will ask Gump to continue.

-David

> Many thanks to Stefan and others for their efforts with Gump.
> 
> -David
> 
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > Dear Community
> > 
> > Apache Gump builds some of your projects and it is quite possible you
> > don't know or have by now forgotten about it.
> > 
> > More than half a year ago a technical problem has forced us to turn off
> > emails on build failures as we would have been sending out lots of false
> > alarms.
> > 
> > Before we re-enable emails we'd like to know whether you are still
> > interested in the service Gump provides, so please tell us. :-)
> > 
> > Metadata for many projects have been neglected for a long time and it is
> > quite possible they'd need some love for results to be meaningful.  All
> > Apache committers have write access to Gump's metadata.
> > 
> > In case you don't know what this Gump stuff is about:
> > 
> > Apache Gump builds the full stack of the latest commits of software in
> > order to ensure integrity over releases.  Build failures surface API
> > discontinuities between projects before they impact releases, and Gump's
> > e-mail notifications hope to promote the conversations between teams to
> > resolve those discontinuities.
> > 
> > When responding to this mail please shorten the CC list as appropriate.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> >         Stefan
> > 
> >  on behalf of the Gump PMC
> >