Hi, I am going to assume that Forrest no longer requires the services of Apache Gump and go ahead with the clean-up.
Mark On 2019/06/17 12:07:56, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 17/06/2019 12:46, Tim Williams wrote: > > Hey Mark, > > I suspect not... instead, we should have the dreaded attic discussion I > > reckon. > > Looking at the (lack of) mailing list activity I'd have to concur > although the attic decision isn't my call to make. > > What I can do, whether Forrest decides to got to the attic or not, is > make the following offer: > > If Forrest no longer needs the services of Apache Gump let me (via > gene...@gump.apache.org) know and I'll take care of cleaning all that up > for you. > > Mark > > > > > Thanks, > > --tim > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:55 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> The last successful Apache Forrest build on Gump was over 12 months ago. > >> > >> Looking back ~6 months I don't see any indications of the Apache Forrest > >> community working on the build failures. Granted the issues are mostly > >> in dependencies but that shouldn't prevent the Forrest community > >> addressing them. > >> > >> The current issue is a dependency on xml-stylebook that in turn depends > >> on JVM internals that were removed in Java 7. > >> > >> Are Gump builds still of interest to the Apache Forrest community? > >> > >> Mark > >> > > > >
