J'ai bien noté la subtilité et la possibilité d'appliquer des parenthèses invisibles ou implicites. Quand je parlais de la Polonaise inverse, c'était juste pour exprimer que cette méthodologie de déclaration épargnait l'utilisation fastidieuse des parenthèses comme sur les calculatrice Texas Instrument. Philippe
Bernard Siaud alias Troumad a écrit : > Philippe MOREAU a écrit : >> [...] >> >> ça me rappelle un vague souvenir de la calculatrice HP qui travaillait >> en Polonaise inverse ! >> Se n'est pas un bug à mon sens >> >> Philippe > Pour information : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : >> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=82833 >> >> >> >> ------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 24 12:52:51 >> +0000 2007 ------- >> TL: It turns out it is as easily to replace them in general as for >> specific >> commands only. >> Thus it seems inappropriate to replace them in general since that >> would also >> include commands like "cos(<?>)" where there is absolute no benefit in >> adding >> additional {} to the argument since the () from the cos already functions >> similar to {}. >> >> Thus I will change a hand select list of commands only (including the >> 'over'). >> >> TL->ALL: Thus if you have a specific request where the {} brackets >> should be >> added please add it here within the next few days and then I will take >> care of >> this issue next week. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
