Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi Jurgen
we should first discuss the necessary features, create a spec and i
would say OOo3.0 is a good timeframe. We have extended the add-on
features in the past sometimes to fast, we have now mixed concepts
which of course are working but in the long term they are not
maintainable and they make the whole feature more complex as
necessary. I am strictly again more quick hacks. The add-on feature
with all improvements in the future is to important.
I do agree with your statement
doing things the "right way" (TM)
Btw, i've actuly a need to rename this Addon-1
So without changing to the actual imlemntation, i'm trying to find a
workaround
With the extensions project, i think this will be asked
It could be cool if we had a workaround to propose
Hi Laurent,
see my comments to your proposal below ( I also added them to the bug
59087):
--> perharps playing with
./user/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterWindowState.xcu:
<value
xml:lang="fr">Add-on 1</value>
It's possible, but with some draw backs:
1.) You can only change the toolbar name for one module or the
implementation has to change the name for all modules.
2.) We don't have a unique ID for an add-on/add-on toolbar. Therefore
the entries in the WindowState.xcu files are not bad but there can be
name clashes. You even don't know which add-on is bound to which add-on
toolbar in the WindowState.xcu. Think of one add-on is uninstalled and
two are installed. That's why we think of a better way to support this.
Currently I have no good solution for this problem. Changing the
Addon.xcs file for OOo 2.0.x would make add-ons downward incompatible.
An add-on for OOo 2.0.x wouldn't work for OOo 2.0 as the Addon.xcu is
not compatible with the schema!
Regards,
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
