Thanks for the response. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Lohmaier > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:18 AM > > You should know, that he talks about the Mac-port. And on > Mac, there's only one "Application", only one Icon to click > on to launch OOo So the Mac-user will always start OOo > Writer. And from within Writer he can open the other apps. > > The only way to launch calc directly on Mac, is to use a calc > document template to click on, or to create a custom launcher > (the last solution is nothing that could be done by the > "regular mac user") > > So I'm pretty sure Shaun did mean that, and not really > splitting up the apps.
Clear. > > > Are there any plans to move away from our current monolitic binary? > > Well, OOo isn't monolithic - and I don't think there are any > new plans regarding "splitting it up in separate > applications". I guess more effort will be put in > restructuring the parts in a more clever way, so that not all > features are loaded at once, but when they are needed. > Making them truly separate would be a bad idea. Why so? Separating apps would allow to isolate crash in one app, one busy process would not block other apps and utilising multiple processors/cores would be so much easier with separate processes. Code reuse could be done via dlls, right? WBR, KP. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
