Sounds like a plan ...
> On 07.10.2021, at 20:17, Daniel Dekany <daniel.dek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, for now I don't think you can help. But when it will be mostly
> done, looking for problems will be welcome.
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:53 PM Siegfried Goeschl
> <siegfried.goes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Is there anything I can help with, e.g. reviewing code, writing tests,
>> checking documentation?
>>
>> I should be able to find some time and I already missed LocalData support
>> during my last project.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>>
>>> On 02.10.2021, at 20:24, Daniel Dekany <daniel.dek...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Not yet, but there's a FREEMARKER-35 branch that deals with all the
>>> java.time types. It works at the first sight, but actually will need a
>>> significant amount of work before it can be released. I plan to put some
>>> aside time for a "sprint" on it near the end of October. We will see.
>>> And yes, I also want to add at least a few date operations built-ins.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:59 AM Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Does Freemarker have plans to support using java.time.LocalDate instead
>>>> of java.util.Date?
>>>>
>>>> The latter is causing off-by-one errors for in our Freemarker templates
>>>> if executed in certain timezones (and adjusting the timezone opens
>>>> another can of worms).
>>>> See https://github.com/jbake-org/jbake/issues/726
>>>>
>>>> Also, many java.time methods, such as plusDays(3) or next monday,
>>>> would be very welcome in Freemarker templates.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> With kind regards,
>>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Daniel Dekany
