Not this weekend either... but it starts to bother me quite much, so eventually... But, why, is there a OFBiz release to catch?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Any chances ? > > TIA > > Jacques > > Le 22/09/2024 à 15:08, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > > Haven't put the time into it yet... but, yes, I should push this. Maybe > > next weekend I will start voting. Will see. > > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 1:22 PM Jacques Le Roux < > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> What is the situation here? > >> > >> TIA > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> Le 29/08/2024 à 09:37, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> With https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13131 I have > committed > >> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/9d43c4dd5e to test the > >>> change toward 2.3.34-SNAPSHOT > >>> > >>> It's now a week, and checking daily the OFBiz trunk demo error.log I > did > >> not find any related issue. > >>> So it's OK with me to release 2.3.34 > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 22/08/2024 à 08:40, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>> Ah, I did not know that. Then we can backport. I'll not it in the > Jira. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> Le 21/08/2024 à 23:34, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >>>>> OK, thanks! > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm not getting why the Java version is relevant though. > Multi-release > >> JAR > >>>>> format was introduced with Java 9 (and Java 8 will just ignore the > >> related > >>>>> directories inside META-INF, so we are also Java 8 compatible.) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:17 AM Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Le 19/08/2024 à 14:01, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > >>>>>>> While we have not much changes accumulated yet, the tooling related > >>>>>>> issues with 2.3.33 freemarker.jar (see below) warrants an urgent > >>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The current change log of 2.3.34 is this: > >>>>>>> > >> > https://freemarker.apache.org/builds/2.3.34-SNAPSHOT/_html/versions_2_3_34.html > >>>>>>> Latest build is published to the Apache snapshot repo: > >>>>>>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.34-SNAPSHOT/ > >>>>>>> About the tooling related issues: 2.3.33 freemarker.jar contains > >> class > >>>>>>> files compiled with various Java versions (8, 9, and 16). In > theory, > >>>>>>> that should work, but is unusual. It turns out, Maven Enforcer, and > >>>>>>> apparently GraalVM Native complains about it. Maybe other tools > have > >>>>>>> problems with it too. So we switched to "multi-release JAR" (JEP > 238) > >>>>>>> format, which is the clean and official solution for our problem > >>>>>>> anyway. However, that's not a very well-known Java feature, and I > >> can > >>>>>>> imagine that proper support for it is spotty. So, does it work with > >>>>>>> your tooling (like does the build issue warnings)? Does it work in > >>>>>>> your runtime environment (print the return value of > >>>>>>> _Java9.isSupported(), and _Java16.isSupported() to see, also if you > >>>>>>> are using record support successfully, that's another proof that > it's > >>>>>>> still working)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also note in the README that ad-hoc "main" methods from the IDE > won't > >>>>>>> work properly anymore, and you have to create a JUnit test instead. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for any help! > >>>>>> Hi Daniel, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We (OFBiz community) have started testing with > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13131 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We use Java 17 in trunk, I don't think we will backport in our > current > >>>>>> stable version (18.12 branch) because it uses Java 11 and 2.3.33 is > >> quite > >>>>>> OK > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For now we did not cross any issues. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>> > > > -- Best regards, Daniel Dekany
