Sure Daniel, http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf Will it be sufficient to fill this copy scan and email to [email protected] as mentioned here http://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting ? Pradeep.
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:45:33 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FM-Online connect with Manual > > OK, that's all fine. > > If you going to modify Docgen, you will need a CLA at ASF, if you > don't yet have it. > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Wednesday, September 23, 2015, 11:54:20 AM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, > >> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:01:25 +0200 > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: FM-Online connect with Manual > >> > >> Sorry... it was in the back of my head, but now... > >> > >> I see no fundamental problem with it. Some minor notices: > >> > >> I think it's unnecessary to move the immediate execution functionality > >> out to js/execute.js, especially as there's many other "ready" > >> functionality just bellow it, inside that "script" element directly. > >> It could fit on there. > >> > > Yeah I moved it over there > >> Also I guess it would be more reliable if the immediate execution > >> action is the last among the "ready" actions, because that's when it > >> happens in the normal (non-Manual) case too. > >> > > Yeah Non-Manual, we don't this since the button click will trigger the same. > >> Some JavaDoc about FreeMarkerOnlineView constuctor paramteters, > >> especially about `execute` wouldn't hurt at this point. > >> > > I have added the doc. added description only for execute since I > > feel other params are explicit. Let me know If i need to add for the other > > 2 as well. > >> I see your pull request is still pending... Well, after 14 days or so > >> I will start asking about it. Also when this current thing is ready, > >> push it too. > >> > >> And yes, you in general you are supposed to work in feature branches > >> and push those, otherwise you append to the last "master" push. > >> However, I say, this current work can be appended to it, as they > >> aren't really separate features. > >> > > I have added to the same pull request. > > Pradeep. > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Daniel Dekany > >> > >> > >> Monday, September 21, 2015, 7:43:08 PM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: > >> > >> > Daniel, > >> > got a chance to review the changes ? > >> > Pradeep. > >> > > >> >> From: [email protected] > >> >> To: [email protected] > >> >> Subject: RE: FM-Online connect with Manual > >> >> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 22:52:11 +0530 > >> >> > >> >> Hi Daniel, > >> >> the POC worked. So I have made the changes to suit our idea of > >> >> triggering Ajax when we click from manual. > >> >> I have removed the non ajax code and also modified the unit test cases. > >> >> Removed a file that is not used after the changes. > >> >> https://github.com/pradeepmurugesan/freemarker-online/commit/d90745d91d94503f444fab8ac41d8a0443ac5794 > >> >> https://github.com/pradeepmurugesan/freemarker-online/commit/546a73cb4476a8b981858825c907704ece36973d > >> >> I have checked these into another branch(FreeMarker_Manual_Try_it_out) > >> >> since the first pull request is not accepted by them yet and I am not > >> >> sure If I push these changes it will go as part of existing pull > >> >> request. > >> >> Kindly review and let me know if any changes. > >> >> Pradeep. > >> >> > >> >> > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:39:36 +0200 > >> >> > From: [email protected] > >> >> > To: [email protected] > >> >> > Subject: Re: FM-Online connect with Manual > >> >> > > >> >> > I agree with what you have described. > >> >> > > >> >> > You have earlier said that this will work by first rendering the page > >> >> > with the filled form, and then sending the AJAX request. That's the > >> >> > most maintainable way of doing this, as it requires almost no > >> >> > duplicated functionality. So that's maybe fine. But the more efficient > >> >> > (lowest response time) way off doing this is also rendering the > >> >> > response together with the filled form, so there's no AJAX request. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Wednesday, September 16, 2015, 7:05:58 AM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Yeah I think the Cross Domain issues comes into play with > >> >> > > javascript. This approach should work. Let me do a POC and come > >> >> > > back if its not working. > >> >> > > Meanwhile please let me know if we have different visualizations. > >> >> > > Pradeep. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> From: [email protected] > >> >> > >> To: [email protected] > >> >> > >> Subject: RE: FM-Online connect with Manual > >> >> > >> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:22:32 +0530 > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > <form target="manualFMOnline" action="..." > >> >> > >> > method="post">...</form> > >> >> > >> Hmmm but the above code will be in our manual , we should get > >> >> > >> redirected to the FM-Online domain right. That's where I am > >> >> > >> doubting whether cross domain POST will be allowed through browser > >> >> > >> redirection. > >> >> > >> Ok Even before going there , Let me tell my understanding so that > >> >> > >> lets check if we are on the same page. > >> >> > >> 1. FM Manual website will have a button or a link saying "try it > >> >> > >> out" or something like that.2. When the user clicks on the same he > >> >> > >> will redirected to a new page(FM-Online) where the corresponding > >> >> > >> template and datamodel will be prefilled and executed. > >> >> > >> Am I right regarding this ? > >> >> > >> Kindly let me know if you have visualised something different ? > >> >> > >> Pradeep. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:39:21 +0200 > >> >> > >> > From: [email protected] > >> >> > >> > To: [email protected] > >> >> > >> > Subject: Re: FM-Online connect with Manual > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Huh? I meant: > >> >> > >> > <form target="manualFMOnline" action="..." > >> >> > >> > method="post">...</form> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Tuesday, September 15, 2015, 11:39:49 AM, Dékány Dániel wrote: > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > Won't something like <format target="manualFMOnline" > >> >> > >> > > method="post">...</form> work? Anyway, I think both POST and > >> >> > >> > > GET > >> >> > >> > > should do the same, but using POST should be the norm. With > >> >> > >> > > GET you > >> >> > >> > > can get some very long URLs. While URL-s up to 2K length used > >> >> > >> > > to > >> >> > >> > > work on most places, even URL-s over 256 bytes is sometimes > >> >> > >> > > considered worrisome. > >> >> > >> > > Pradeep Murugesan <[email protected]> írta: > >> >> > >> > >>Hi Daniel, > >> >> > >> > >> The initial idea was when people click from manual we POST to > >> >> > >> > >> the "/" with template and dataModel and get the page rendered > >> >> > >> > >> directly. We do not have any direct method to open a new tab > >> >> > >> > >> and directly post data. Some round about ways were mentioned > >> >> > >> > >> in web but nothing concrete. > >> >> > >> > >>So I thought of > >> >> > >> > >>1. Issuing a GET request to fmonline/ with formdata. This will > >> >> > >> > >>help us to populate the fields.2. We will also see if formdata > >> >> > >> > >>is not empty then we will call our execute via ajax. 3. If > >> >> > >> > >>formdata is empty we will know that its a normal GET request > >> >> > >> > >>(i.e not from manual) and render the empty page. > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >>Let me know your thoughts. > >> >> > >> > >>Pradeep. > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > -- > >> >> > >> > Thanks, > >> >> > >> > Daniel Dekany > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Daniel Dekany > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >
