Thanks Jacopo! Guys, don't miss `ant test` if you are voting on a release!
Eclipse Orbit dependencies are required to run the tests. I have checked, and the orbit artifacts are there. Jacopo, can you try this: 1. Delete your user-level Ivy caches: ~/.ivy2 2. ant clean-deps 3. ant update-deps Here's the relevant part from my update-deps console output: ... [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/javax.servlet/2.5.0.v201103041518/javax.servlet-2.5.0.v201103041518.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ..... (116kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#javax.servlet;2.5.0.v201103041518!javax.servlet.jar(orbit) (132ms) ... [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/javax.servlet.jsp/2.1.0.v201105211820/javax.servlet.jsp-2.1.0.v201105211820.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ...... (112kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#javax.servlet.jsp;2.1.0.v201105211820!javax.servlet.jsp.jar(orbit) (126ms) [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/org.apache.jasper.glassfish/2.1.0.v201110031002/org.apache.jasper.glassfish-2.1.0.v201110031002.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ................. (550kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#org.apache.jasper.glassfish;2.1.0.v201110031002!org.apache.jasper.glassfish.jar(orbit) (249ms) [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl/1.2.0.v201105211821/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl-1.2.0.v201105211821.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ...... (50kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#javax.servlet.jsp.jstl;1.2.0.v201105211821!javax.servlet.jsp.jstl.jar(orbit) (130ms) [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish/1.2.0.v201112081803/org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish-1.2.0.v201112081803.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ............... (419kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish;1.2.0.v201112081803!org.apache.taglibs.standard.glassfish.jar(orbit) (208ms) [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/javax.el/2.1.0.v201105211819/javax.el-2.1.0.v201105211819.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ... (67kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#javax.el;2.1.0.v201105211819!javax.el.jar(orbit) (114ms) [ivy:retrieve] downloading http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/orbit/com.sun.el/1.0.0.v201105211818/com.sun.el-1.0.0.v201105211818.jar ... [ivy:retrieve] ..... (131kB) [ivy:retrieve] .. (0kB) [ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.eclipse.jetty.orbit#com.sun.el;1.0.0.v201105211818!com.sun.el.jar(orbit) (130ms) ... -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Saturday, June 18, 2016, 9:26:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Signature verification: passed > MD5 hash verification: passed > SHA512 verification: passed > Building from source: passed; however I had to comment out the dependencies > on org.eclipse.jetty artifacts (Ivy was unable to locate *.orbit artifacts) > Testing with OFBiz trunk: successful > > Kind regards, > > Jacopo > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating! If this voting >> passes, another similar voting will be started on >> [email protected], and if that passes too, then we can >> release this version. >> >> Note that because there weren't many deep changes since >> 2.3.24-incubating, we have no Release Candidate this time. Thus, it's >> important that you don't skip testing this release with your dependant >> projects. >> >> Release Notes: >> >> http://freemarker.org/builds/2.3.25-incubating-voted/documentation/_html/versions_2_3_25.html >> >> Before proceed, you should know that FreeMarker 2.3.x, for a long >> time, always releases a normal and a "gae" variant on the same time, >> which are technically two independent source trees (Git branches). The >> "gae" variant contains a few small modification in the Java source >> code to be Google App Engine compliant, and has freemarker-gae as the >> Maven artifact name. Otherwise the normal and the "gae" branches are >> identical. Hence they will be voted on together. >> >> The commits to be voted upon are: >> - Normal (non-gae) variant: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=e6b61c6cfbb2d8ed626b82e25b8f93489f8750fc >> Commit hash: e6b61c6cfbb2d8ed626b82e25b8f93489f8750fc >> - "gae" variant: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=504ec38d9bad04064645494f448cea51b6c5fb1f >> Commit hash: 504ec38d9bad04064645494f448cea51b6c5fb1f >> >> The artifacts to be voted upon are located here: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.25-incubating/source/ >> where the source release artifacts are: >> - Normal (non-gae) variant: >> apache-freemarker-2.3.25-incubating-src.tar.gz >> - "gae" variant: >> apache-freemarker-gae-2.3.25-incubating-src.tar.gz >> >> See the README inside them for build instructions! >> >> The release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ddekany.asc >> >> Note that for convenience, we also provide binaries: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.25-incubating/binaries/ >> and Maven artifacts in the ASF staging repository: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.25-incubating/ >> >> Please try out the package and vote! >> >> The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of >> votes (3 binding +1s) is reached. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating >> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> >> Please add "(binding)" if your vote is binding. >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >>
