Tuesday, December 27, 2016, 11:39:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:51 PM Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >> Basically yes. Though I will try to "exploit" that for doing at least >> some non-BC API cleanups, and ideally much more. > > I'm not sure what you mean by BC in either place where its used in this email > thread.
Sorry. BC stands for Backward Compatible. >> (note this email is purely from a IPMC member's perspective, don't take it >> as verbatim) >> >> So I assume I should re-post this mail to incubator-general. Should I >> still offer adding "(incubating)" to the "name" in the POM? My concern >> there is that the project "name" was changed from "FreeMarker" to >> "Apache FreeMarker", which I believe meant to be done for incubating >> project. And so then in the POM we end up with "Apache <Something>" >> without "incubating" anywhere around (as we remove that from the >> "version""). > > That's up to you. The official ASF guide is here: > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html > It makes no reference to what should be in name, groupId or > artifactId. There are customs and best practices, but no mandates on the > content. I see, thanks. I will ask permission for doing this, just to be sure... -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
