As far as I'm concerned, just let's go ahead with Confluence (I was the one who had expressed doubts regarding Confluence, that's why I'm saying this now.)
Tuesday, January 10, 2017, 11:07:46 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > Hi > > I'm just picking this up as I didn't see any next steps regarding the wiki. > > If people prefer using confluence then we can easily ask infra to > get one setup. Do you want me to make the request? > > Thanks > Sharan > > On 2017-01-07 23:04 (+0100), Jacques Le Roux > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The Confluence version at the ASF works well now. It's a reliable WYSIWG >> version. >> >> One of the big advantages of Confluence is it allows finely grained >> permissions. This is not only useful with spam. >> >> Another advantage is it has, even at the ASF, a lot of available plugins >> >> This said it can be sometimes a bit slow, and creating long complicated page >> can turn to a be nightmare especially if you put a lot of images. At >> least now you never lose anything, it has a very good automated versionning >> system... >> >> Jacques >> >> PS: I don't think anybody is a Confluence huge fan ;) >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1adaf03b52c34de6a3502a9bab2f8c27548071d2105aeac41f11ccf4@1432806673@%3Cuser.ofbiz.apache.org%3E >> >> >> Le 07/01/2017 � 20:36, Daniel Dekany a �crit : >> > Does Confluence work well for developer topics though? Because I guess >> > we will want to use it for FM3. I had to use it on workplace, a >> > relatively old version, and it was a nightmare because it gets >> > confused by the odd stuff we programmers write... and yes, there are >> > some escaping rules and all, but over all it wasn't practical to use, >> > plus it was buggy... though yet again maybe nowadays it's better. >> > >> > >> > Saturday, January 7, 2017, 7:17:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> > >> >> I'd prefer Confluence as we have experience with it in the OFBiz team >> >> >> >> My 2cts >> >> >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 07/01/2017 � 18:49, Jacopo Cappellato a �crit : >> >>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> We have never requested a wiki from infra... so I as far as know we >> >>>> don't have it yet. >> >>> Should we request one? It can be useful to work together on a shared >> >>> document like in this case. Suggestions/proposals/preferences? >> >>> >> >>> Jacopo >> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
