I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites (ie certain sites require a square logo).
-David ![](https://link.nylas.com/open/5xm8m568zhx9qyloglsg31huz/local-30aff82b- 1fd7?r=ZGV2QGZyZWVtYXJrZXIuaW5jdWJhdG9yLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc=) On Jan 19 2017, at 4:30 am, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all, changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling if you have maintained FM... <-; ). > > I change my vote to +1 for #1.5. > > Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote: > > > Hello, > > I prefer #1. > > But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments > (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer > #1.5 ;) > > Regards, > > Julien. > > > On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> We will replace our square logo at Twitter >> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo >> in the future elsewhere too. >> >> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)? >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c >> >> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them >> anywhere.) >> >> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these! >> > > > > \-- Thanks, Daniel Dekany