Yeah.. The staging tasks right ??
I have already removed those.. Will send a PR.. Pradeep. ________________________________ From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 3:30:20 PM To: Pradeep Murugesan Subject: Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting Speaking of which, those Gradle scripts contain a lot of complication that we don't need... a cleanup would be nice. Friday, May 5, 2017, 2:52:44 PM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: > Great... > > > Pradeep. > > ________________________________ > From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:20:42 PM > To: Pradeep Murugesan > Subject: Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting > > Friday, May 5, 2017, 12:41:34 PM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: > >> [?].. Ok.. But to be ready from our side , Are you aware of the >> release process that Kenshoo followed ? > > No. But it's just a trivial micro service, so all we need to do is > defining a systemd service in the terminal that calls `java -jar > /opt/freemarker-online-tester.jar`. > >> I mean how to build the production artifact, I see a debian >> packaging task in the gradle to build one. Are we going to follow the same ? > > We only need an "über jar" (aka fat jar). > >> Any details that you are aware of would be helpful, so that we can be ready. > > We are already ready. > >> >> Pradeep. >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 11:59:13 AM >> To: Pradeep Murugesan >> Subject: Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting >> >> No idea on my side. But first let's see if we will have a VM at all... >> >> >> Wednesday, May 3, 2017, 9:46:34 AM, Pradeep Murugesan wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> >>> Any idea whether the VM will be reachable from Travis CI, if we >>> need to do a continuous delivery ? >>> >>> >>> Pradeep. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:44:52 AM >>> To: Daniel Dekany >>> Subject: Re: FreeMarker Online Tester legal status and hosting >>> >>> Forgot to include GitHub link: >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker-online-tester >>> >>> Tuesday, May 2, 2017, 11:42:56 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >>> >>>> We have received the source code donation of said service form >>>> Kenshoo. Pradeep has changed the license headers and renamed the >>>> packages, and did some other cleanup. While we plan to do further >>>> development, the service works, and should be deployed to somewhere, >>>> so that it can take over from http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/. >>>> >>>> Can someone help in moving this issue ahead: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13246 "Create a demo VM >>>> for the Freemarker project". Infra has certainly no right to decide if >>>> we can receive such a resource, and we should bringing this up on the >>>> right forum. On incubator-general is guess. >>>> >>>> Also, anyone is aware of any legal obstacle that prevents deploying >>>> this service to Apache infrastructure? >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel Dekany >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
