Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 4:20:35 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
[snip]
> I've proposed a PR for tags defined in spring.tld for now:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/pull/34
> I'll continue to replace tags in form.tld.
Thanks, looks good, I have merged it!
One day (probably when you feel it's already polished) I will go
through it thoroughly. For now I have more like skimmed through it. So
tell me if I should look at something more closely, like you have some
doubts there. Some random remarks:
- AbstractSpringTemplateDirectiveModel and its subclasses probably
shouldn't be public. (Also executeInternal probably should be
protected.) Generally, we should avoid exposing things as published
API-s, because they all become backward compatibility constraints.
(It's major difficulty with libraries that thousands of projects
depend on, as I have learned the hard way with FM2...)
- final MessageSourceResolvable messageResolvable = (messageResolvableModel !=
null)
? (MessageSourceResolvable)
objectWrapperAndUnwrapper.unwrap(messageResolvableModel) : null;
You can have ClassCastException here instead of a TemplateException
that explains the higher level problem. Certainly you should
introduce and then use something like:
CallableUtil.getAndUnwrapArgument(..., MessageSourceResolvable.class, ...)
- Things similar to this:
<#assign expression="T(java.lang.Math).max(12.34, 56.78)" />
<div id="maxNumber">${spring.eval(expression)}</div>
or this:
<#assign pathInfo="http://freemarker.org/docs/index.html"; />
<a href="${spring.url(pathInfo)}">Apache FreeMarker Manual</a>
I think they are more readable (for most of us anyway) without the
intermediate variable that's use only once. Like:
<div id="maxNumber">${spring.eval("T(java.lang.Math).max(12.34,
56.78)")}</div>
> Thanks,
>
> Woonsan
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Woonsan
>>
>>>
>>>> (ref:
>>>> https://github.com/woonsan/spring-mvc-freemarker3-demo/blob/master/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/views/useredit.ftl)
>>>>
>>>> Still need to add an example using 'message' named parameter.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Woonsan
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> look at `spring.message("foo")`, I think you would intuitively think
>>>>>> that it prints the "foo" message. As of the others, I guess we don't
>>>>>> need "text" as you can write ${spring.message("foo")!'default'}, nor
>>>>>> do we need the xxxEscape parameters, as we have HTML auto-escaping and
>>>>>> `spring.message("foo")?jsString`.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, cool! I didn't know we have ?jsString. Perfect.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something that would be interesting if the spring.message function can
>>>>>>>> somehow tell if a message is plain text or HTML. Like you can
>>>>>>>> configure which messages are HTML on name patterns (or a content
>>>>>>>> pattern, like all HTML values start with "<span>"). After all, without
>>>>>>>> such a rule, how do the developers themselves know if a message should
>>>>>>>> be HTML or plain text. Hopefully the have some exact policy for that.
>>>>>>>> If spring.message knows that rule too, then for HTML messages it
>>>>>>>> should return a TemplateMarkupOutputModel instead of a string, so it
>>>>>>>> will be automatically non-escaped. Then people can just write
>>>>>>>> ${spring.message("foo")} without worrying about `?noEsc`. And then we
>>>>>>>> certainly don't need the directive "overload" either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I know, MessageTag extends HtmlEscapingAwareTag which has
>>>>>>> the following javadoc:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * <p>Provides a "htmlEscape" property for explicitly specifying
>>>>>>> whether to
>>>>>>> * apply HTML escaping. If not set, a page-level default (e.g. from the
>>>>>>> * HtmlEscapeTag) or an application-wide default (the
>>>>>>> "defaultHtmlEscape"
>>>>>>> * context-param in {@code web.xml}) is used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So then it seems we indeed need some spring library configuration
>>>>>> parameter that associates an output format (as in
>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/dgui_misc_autoescaping.html) to each
>>>>>> message, based on patterns. By default everything should be just plain
>>>>>> text, to be on the safe side (i.e., auto-escaping will happen for
>>>>>> them, because ${} does that). The equivalent of "defaultHtmlEscape"
>>>>>> being on is that you assoicate "HTML" output format to all messages.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This also reinforces that, at least in the first iteration,
>>>>>> spring.message should be function only, not a directive.
>>>>>> `${spring.message("foo")}` isn't more verbose than
>>>>>> `<@spring.message "foo" />` anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, I think it may worth having a special syntax for message
>>>>>> insertion in the template language. For example,
>>>>>> %{label.greet user, today} would be a syntactical sugar for
>>>>>> ${someframewok.message('label.greet', user, today)}. But that's
>>>>>> another topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds promising!
>>>>>
>>>>> Woonsan
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Woonsan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By the way, I'm wondering what the best practices are in naming those
>>>>>>>>>> models. Should it be better with 'form', 'spring_form',
>>>>>>>>>> 'spring.form',
>>>>>>>>>> or something else? Prefixing with something sounds safer to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the templates they should be accessible as <@spring.bind ...> and
>>>>>>>>> such. In the case of the form tags, as it's in a separate namespace in
>>>>>>>>> JSP, maybe it should be <@form.input ...> etc. (Though I'm not 100%
>>>>>>>>> sure if its practical the structure of the JSP taglibs so closely, and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I meant: "if it's practical to follow the structure of the JSP taglibs
>>>>>>>> so closely"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe we could just go with <@spring.input ...>. I don't know.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Woonsan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/spring-tld.html
>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/spring-form-tld.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Besides, just to be absolutely clear, I would merge your current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well, if it doesn't raise licensing issues, which is of course a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, no worries. I was also under a concern about that and wanted
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> get feedbacks before doing too much. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Woonsan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday, August 7, 2017, 4:23:26 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The big problem is that spring.ftl is copyrighted by some of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring authors (or the Spring project as a whole - it's not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear). So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certainly we can't just copy it. It has to be reimplemented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at the source, or something absurd like that. Perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is to start out from the spring JSP taglib, as that's the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used templating solution (I assume), so certainly that's the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the features are exposed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if using #import + FTL is the best way of adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> framework-level functionality that's used by a lot of people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely an OK way, but it's not the highest performance way. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way is using a shared variable (or some other kind of commonly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> variable) and implement the library in Java using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s. It's less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenient than doing it in FTL, but it has to be done once,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> save some resources everywhere where it's used. Though as most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these macros/functions are quite simple, I don't think the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference matters much. But, it also avoids the legal issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean, many of these function/macros are so trivial, that it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement them on a different way in FTL than as it is in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source code, but if you implement them in Java, then it's much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to accuse anyone with stealing. (A minor annoyance right now is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that part of the FreeMarker API is not yet settled; see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FREEMARKER-63,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FREEMARKER-64, FREEMARKER-65. But hopefully it will be in a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough shape soon. And see other thread; input is welcome!)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As of template aliases, at the first glance that's fine. Note
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's MultiTemplateLoader which does something similar, but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be less neat (and/or slower) to do this with that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (But if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the spring functionality won't be #import-ed after all (as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above), the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whole thing can become unnecessary...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for sharing your insights. Greatly helpful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it might be better with template model(s) rather
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library FTL in various aspects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me try with that approach again and let you know soon with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Woonsan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunday, August 6, 2017, 7:22:00 AM, ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16115649#comment-16115649
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ASF GitHub Bot commented on FREEMARKER-55:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GitHub user woonsan opened a pull request:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/pull/31
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FREEMARKER-55: spring.ftl marco lib support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Support <#import "/spring.ftl" as spring> like Spring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Framework does.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - By default, the system lib from /spring.ftl is read from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific classpath, not from app's template path.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The system template aliases map can be customized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SpringResourceTemplateLoader.systemTemplateAliases property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same macros and functions are defined in /spring.ftl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Framework's, with syntax changes to comply with FM3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Note: As the system template lib support is handled by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SpringTemplateLoader in this PR, it means developers should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use SpringTemplateLoader directly or indirectly in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system macro library. Please review this decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - TODOs: review/test/refine each macro and functions in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring.ftl.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ git pull https://github.com/woonsan/incubator-freemarker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/pull/31.patch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with (at least) the following in the commit message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This closes #31
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 8e0f33c419d982279d7fb22a9dfdc66f47abaf2c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-07-14T15:27:17Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FREEMARKER-55: Renaming Freemarker to FreeMarker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit ec8d687d4ce2c0e1bb3e3ca073b139eacc198527
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-07-14T15:53:51Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merge branch '3' into feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit e7cb6f7cfc241689c85527971bf6e1ea7ced9127
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-07-14T17:57:29Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merge branch '3' into feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit c6eb09de91e57035c1e0e3c4d3490b3b96622bab
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-07-16T18:24:55Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merge branch '3' into feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 870209fa8e0acd0bb3186053dfd549b5c758e37d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-07-18T00:38:03Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merge branch '3' into feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 4481406a2f4eeb30d6d044a4ac158efab7ba7a7b
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-08-06T01:28:54Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merge branch '3' into feature/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit fcd9e672ec515e3042bc5efd229b7d12c23e7d88
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2017-08-06T05:09:12Z
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FREEMARKER-55: system template lib for spring app:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring.ftl.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FM3 freemarker-spring module, Web MVC support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key: FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-55
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project: Apache Freemarker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue Type: Task
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reporter: Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add Spring "Web MVC framework" functionality to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freemarker-spring.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This can be complex task (and the issue possibly has to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subdivided), as it involves things like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Some aspects of the FreeMarker 2 integration (developed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Spring developers) are quite confusing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ({{FreemarerConfigurer}}, etc.), and we are looking into if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it needs to be like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * See if we can support {{@EnableWebMvc}} (note that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeMarker 2 support is hard coded into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {{ViewResolverRegistry}}, which we can't modify)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Creating custom directives/methods to expose Spring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features like the Spring JSP Tag Library does (but in a way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that firs FreeMarker better)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Expose JSP custom tag support from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {{freemarker-servlet}} module.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on: FREEMARKER-54
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (v6.4.14#64029)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel Dekany
>>>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
